Philosophical Method Page

Declaration of Philosophical Method

The philosophical method adopted here is neither a technique nor an external grid applied to any content. It is the operative gesture itself of ontology in emergence — a form of symbolic organization of the instability of the real, which refuses both the imposition of form and the dissolution of requirement. Thinking, for this current, is inscribing.

This method arises from the radical refusal of any automatic procedure of thought. It refuses the thesis, the antithesis, the synthesis; it refuses the model; it refuses the protocol. Because what is at stake is not demonstrating a pre-existing truth, but making a field of meaning not yet configured emerge.

1. Thinking as Symbolic Risk

Each question demands its own way of being written. Thought only organizes itself as a response when it accepts exposure to the instability that summons it.

Thought is risky — not as subjective adventure, but as a material gesture of symbolic reorganization.

Style is not ornamentation: it is the visible form of the traversal. There is no method that precedes listening. There is no writing that is not exposure to the unprecedented.

2. Rejection of Methodological Teleology

Writing does not aim for a conclusion. One does not start from an idea to defend, but from a friction from which something begins to reorganize itself.

Each text emerges as a symbolic fold of a persistent question. The method is operative attention to what pulses at the limit — not discipline, not doctrine, not succession.

Thought here does not intend to lead to a place. Thought happens — and this happening reconfigures what was thinkable until then.

3. Singularity and Friction

The question precedes language. It is the question that demands form, rhythm, gesture.

One does not think by generality, but by operative microdifference. Philosophy here does not seek synthesis, but symbolic exposure of the organizing fracture.

Each text must maintain its structural singularity. There are no chapters, but fields. There is no system, but zones of symbolic friction.

4. Writing as Ontological Gesture

Philosophical writing does not serve to communicate ideas. It is the very gesture of ontology reorganizing itself into symbolic material.

Writing is not translating thought: it is producing thought through inscription.

Therefore, language must be rigorous, precise, stripped of hollow ornamentation, but open to the symbolic density of the terms. Each word is an ontological choice. Each sentence, a possible reorganization of the real.

5. Commitment to Incompleteness

There is no final truth. There is no closure. There is no destiny of philosophy.

There is only traversal — and the traversal demands method as rigorous listening and as open symbolic operation.

Thought is never concluded. It leaves remnants, traces, thresholds.

This is the only fidelity required of the method: not to betray the unfinished.